Not Exactly!
Meanwhile: Questions for Trump!
Will you provide all citizens a silver-spoon in their mouth at birth?
How is your marriage and bankruptcy record an asset in your transition from business to governing?
We know it was not personal bankruptcy, but neither is the government budget operated like a family budget. How would you navigate these discrepancies?
7-30-15
[Seg(~)Way?] Buchanan / Chomski
Wednesday, July 29, 2015
Sunday, July 26, 2015
CPA or DBA
The Uber-Kents?
Now this is hyperbolically preemptive or supremely not fully read...but one of them might be...
and I may have already fare[!] and balanced the rhetoric, but in Nietzschean fashion be the Uber-Kent. Or hyper-nuanced mild-mannered American Reporters for the daily schlub.
Now fully read, it was much ado about just that.
[When one presumes, one may pre-S out of U or me.]
( Take Back the American Dream )
(b.s.): Poetic Justice , Geometry of Purpose [~]
[BTW~pre~schlub...]
Now this is hyperbolically preemptive or supremely not fully read...but one of them might be...
and I may have already fare[!] and balanced the rhetoric, but in Nietzschean fashion be the Uber-Kent. Or hyper-nuanced mild-mannered American Reporters for the daily schlub.
Now fully read, it was much ado about just that.
[When one presumes, one may pre-S out of U or me.]
( Take Back the American Dream )
(b.s.): Poetic Justice , Geometry of Purpose [~]
[BTW~pre~schlub...]
Friday, July 24, 2015
The Square Root of
[" i. "]
This ... is not being facetious or Freudian. But is there some Hume or Hegel or other geometrics useful to a Platonic Frame?*
BTW: NFRY (not fully read yet) i.e. a bit preemptive
Co-wink Key-dink ? D'oh!
(7-25-15 Fyi: LOL footnotes yet included[!] i.e. under construction)
1. the imaginary unit to solve negative square roots?
2. Chesterton on importance of fables
3. ditto
4. semantic (bs)/bs
5. Mobius
Notational Segway [!] *
*inserting the links, not to read between the lines for you
This ... is not being facetious or Freudian. But is there some Hume or Hegel or other geometrics useful to a Platonic Frame?*
BTW: NFRY (not fully read yet) i.e. a bit preemptive
Co-wink Key-dink ? D'oh!
(7-25-15 Fyi: LOL footnotes yet included[!] i.e. under construction)
1. the imaginary unit to solve negative square roots?
2. Chesterton on importance of fables
3. ditto
4. semantic (bs)/bs
5. Mobius
Notational Segway [!] *
*inserting the links, not to read between the lines for you
Thursday, July 23, 2015
Wednesday, July 22, 2015
Writing while nuanced.
Several alternatives to this heading were considered. "Reading while nuanced."
"Something while white." "Anything while Brooks." OK, they all kind of evolved.*
My point is that Brooks and West are both critical of Coates from a Dream Perspective.
Mean~while there aRe other Elements** of Style[!]
* on the other hand
(Elements) italicized till read / Bolds emphasized read.
Not to be misunderstood, West is about realizing the dream, Brooks is about not realizing the perspective. Both attempt to compliment, but then...there may be the need to complement.
[...UC]
(7-24-15) NFRY SEGWAY: Prior to the Sandra Bland "tragedy"*, I had my own experience with a traffic stop. I was going 48 in a 35, on 4th of July, just outside Mount Rainier National Park. (So the officer told me.) Actually I wish I could recall how he framed his initial comments in the form of a question. I was completely accepting of his information, although my wife thought it may have helped if I had thrown in a "sir" here or there.
What occurred to me later, was what form of answer was I expected to give. I mentioned having just pulled over to allow tailgaters to pass and had just pulled back into traffic and maybe been concerned about those that may be about to replace them, not remembering the speed had been reduced from 55mph. Actually I know I am now recalling it more carefully, than I probably framed the answer at the time. The point is whether it is a practice to frame charges in the form of a question? Of course remembering the question and giving an accurate answer may be beside the point. Are there appropriate answers that would change the situation? Thankfully several inappropriate answers or questions did not occur to me.
*debacle
"Something while white." "Anything while Brooks." OK, they all kind of evolved.*
My point is that Brooks and West are both critical of Coates from a Dream Perspective.
Mean~while there aRe other Elements** of Style[!]
* on the other hand
(Elements) italicized till read / Bolds emphasized read.
Not to be misunderstood, West is about realizing the dream, Brooks is about not realizing the perspective. Both attempt to compliment, but then...there may be the need to complement.
[...UC]
(7-24-15) NFRY SEGWAY: Prior to the Sandra Bland "tragedy"*, I had my own experience with a traffic stop. I was going 48 in a 35, on 4th of July, just outside Mount Rainier National Park. (So the officer told me.) Actually I wish I could recall how he framed his initial comments in the form of a question. I was completely accepting of his information, although my wife thought it may have helped if I had thrown in a "sir" here or there.
What occurred to me later, was what form of answer was I expected to give. I mentioned having just pulled over to allow tailgaters to pass and had just pulled back into traffic and maybe been concerned about those that may be about to replace them, not remembering the speed had been reduced from 55mph. Actually I know I am now recalling it more carefully, than I probably framed the answer at the time. The point is whether it is a practice to frame charges in the form of a question? Of course remembering the question and giving an accurate answer may be beside the point. Are there appropriate answers that would change the situation? Thankfully several inappropriate answers or questions did not occur to me.
*debacle
Sanders / Huntington Para~Dig'em
Or Graham Hunter?
Amalgam in the Middle?
Salon Pre`Foot #$@... Lib~tard Brooks?
(Still under construction) yet...
Amalgam in the Middle?
Salon Pre`Foot #$@... Lib~tard Brooks?
(Still under construction) yet...
Tuesday, July 21, 2015
The Forth Way
To pun on the third way and forgo the geometricks[!]
It was about the political spectrum and aiming for the middle. One could take the left and the right and go for the middle. My point was that the answers are not necessarily an amalgam or in the middle. Though there may be the Trump Beck Rapport ala the Overton Window?*
However, vis a vis 4going the numbers, I simply file these:
Center for American Progress
Our Future**
*TBA or DBA (The Platonic Frame)
** aka TPF (The Peripheral File)^
^ email updates (or Curds and Wey?)
It was about the political spectrum and aiming for the middle. One could take the left and the right and go for the middle. My point was that the answers are not necessarily an amalgam or in the middle. Though there may be the Trump Beck Rapport ala the Overton Window?*
However, vis a vis 4going the numbers, I simply file these:
Center for American Progress
Our Future**
*TBA or DBA (The Platonic Frame)
** aka TPF (The Peripheral File)^
^ email updates (or Curds and Wey?)
Thursday, July 16, 2015
Saturday, July 11, 2015
Deep Thoughts
Still Processing ...*
*not so punderous ponderings [~]
( Manichean TryUnism )
7-12-15
Similar Reading in Progress.
[Exploding the being paradigm. post~temporality "~"]
No Teddy ("~)' ^
Hegelian Rationality?
Bin(un)Jun'Go
Neo-changian?
Relemma'n Leo
Esoteric Relemma[!]
^ accidental perspectivism
(sub-narrative: still processing)
[tangent~"political theorist" & the calling.]
*not so punderous ponderings [~]
( Manichean TryUnism )
7-12-15
Similar Reading in Progress.
[Exploding the being paradigm. post~temporality "~"]
No Teddy ("~)' ^
Hegelian Rationality?
Bin(un)Jun'Go
Neo-changian?
Relemma'n Leo
Esoteric Relemma[!]
^ accidental perspectivism
(sub-narrative: still processing)
[tangent~"political theorist" & the calling.]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)